The Kurdish parliament's Deputy Speaker Hemin Hawrami (left) raises his hand in opposition as speaker as S[ealer Rewaz Fayaq (center) announces adjourning the parliamentary session on May 22, 2023. Photo: Kurdistan Regional Parliament
The recent display of unruly behavior by members of Kurdistan's Parliament has brought disgrace upon the institution, leaving citizens and observers appalled. As viral videos spread across social media platforms, showcasing Kurdish MPs throwing papers, engaging in physical altercations, and screaming at one another, it becomes clear that the conduct witnessed undermines the very essence of democratic governance. While some may argue that parliamentary fights are not exclusive to Kurdistan and have occurred in other countries, it is crucial to recognize the uniqueness of this situation. Unlike other instances, the altercation in Kurdistan's Parliament was centered on the electoral process, a fundamental pillar that should never be called into question.
The establishment and continued existence of the Kurdistan Parliament hold immense importance, extending beyond mere representation of local parties. It symbolizes the progress the region has achieved and showcases the existence of institutions where rules and protocols must be respected. The recent episode of chaos witnessed within the parliament can be considered an attack on the very foundation that legitimizes the ruling of the Kurdistan Regional Government. Such behavior undermines the credibility and integrity of the entire democratic framework.
This incident should not be dismissed as merely a matter of perception by diplomatic missions. Despite the diligent efforts of Kurdish political parties, diplomatic missions are well aware of the internal dynamics, infighting, and lack of coordination prevalent in the region. However, their role is not to rectify these problems directly but rather to maintain stability and prevent their countries from being dragged into conflicts. Their priority lies in promoting dialogue, peace, and stability while preventing the emergence of dictatorships. The responsibility to address and resolve these internal issues ultimately rests with the Kurdish people themselves.
Despite its flaws, Kurdistan Region represents a relatively secure and prosperous haven, rich in natural resources. It stands at the cusp of expansive growth and holds internationally recognized autonomy, setting it apart from other regions historically associated with Kurdistan. With its independent military, judicial system, and educational institutions, Kurdistan possesses the necessary foundation for progress. However, instead of focusing on nurturing and advancing this potential, politicians are engaging in petty bickering, akin to children squabbling in a playground.
It is disheartening to witness members of parliament fighting for the narrow interests of their respective parties rather than genuinely representing the needs and aspirations of the public. Instead of addressing pressing issues like job opportunities for the youth or the quality of education, parliamentarians are preoccupied with internal party rivalries. This behavior not only diminishes public trust but also perpetuates a cycle of ineffective governance, hindering the progress and development Kurdistan desperately needs.
The recent spectacle of anarchy within Kurdistan's Parliament has tarnished the image of the institution and compromised the democratic values it should uphold. Rather than embodying a forum for constructive debate, the parliament has become a stage for disgraceful displays of self-interest and party rivalries. To realize the full potential of Kurdistan and create a prosperous future, it is imperative for politicians to exhibit maturity, prioritize the welfare of the public, and work towards collaborative solutions. Only then can Kurdistan truly thrive as a beacon of democracy and progress in the region.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw
Comments
Rudaw moderates all comments submitted on our website. We welcome comments which are relevant to the article and encourage further discussion about the issues that matter to you. We also welcome constructive criticism about Rudaw.
To be approved for publication, however, your comments must meet our community guidelines.
We will not tolerate the following: profanity, threats, personal attacks, vulgarity, abuse (such as sexism, racism, homophobia or xenophobia), or commercial or personal promotion.
Comments that do not meet our guidelines will be rejected. Comments are not edited – they are either approved or rejected.
Post a comment