Iraq
Iraqis in Basra turn out to mourn the body of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis on January 7, 2019. Photo: Hussein Faleh/AFP
Arch-foes Tehran and Washington may be temporarily calling it even after Iranian missiles targeted US forces in Iraq, but analysts predict violent instability will keep blighting Baghdad.
"Iraq will remain a zone of conflict," said Randa Slim of the Washington based Middle East Institute.
Early Wednesday, Iran launched 22 ballistic missiles at bases in Iraq hosting American and other foreign troops, in a calibrated response to the killing of a top Iranian general in a US air strike last week.
Iran warned Iraq about the raids shortly before they happened and in their immediate aftermath, foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tehran had concluded its "proportionate" retaliation.
US President Donald Trump, too, said Iran "appears to be standing down" and even suggested Tehran and Washington could work towards a nuclear deal while cooperating against jihadists.
That hinted at a common desire to contain the fallout, but analysts say it would not be enough to spare Iraq.
"Both sides are so mobilised in Iraq, which has become such symbolic terrain for hitting out at the other," said Erica Gaston of the New America Foundation.
Indeed, US troops and even the embassy in Baghdad had been hit by more than a dozen rocket attacks in recent months, which have killed one Iraqi soldier and an American contractor.
The attacks went unclaimed but the US blamed hardline elements of the Popular Mobilization Forces (Hashd al-Shaabi), an Iraqi military network incorporated into the state but linked to Tehran.
The strike that killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani outside Baghdad international airport on Friday also killed his top Iraqi aid and Hashd deputy chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.
- 'Who is the mediator?' -
Just because the US and Iran have struck each other directly does not mean the Hashed would now sit on the sidelines, said Gaston.
"The Hashd is closer to the tip of the spear," she said.
"There isn't perfect command-and-control in Hashd, which includes a lot of angry militiamen willing to take revenge on the US," she added.
Bolstered by Iran's attack, Hashd said Wednesday it would take its own steps avenge Muhandis's death.
"That is a promise," vowed leading member Qais al-Khazali.
Hours later, two rockets slammed into the Iraqi capital's Green Zone, the high-security enclave where the US embassy, other foreign missions and some foreign troops are based.
Hashd factions decided in recent days to unite under a "resistance" coalition to oust US troops from Iraq.
The spectre of bloodshed was especially worrisome as there is no evident mediator between the parties, said Slim.
In Lebanon, Iran's ally Hezbollah has repeatedly clashed with its sworn enemy Israel but the United Nations' peacekeeping force in the south has usually intervened before the conflict could spin out of control.
But "who is the mutually liked mediator?" on Iraqi soil, Slim asked.
Baghdad has long warned that tensions between Tehran and Washington, which began deteriorating significantly in 2018, would bring devastating conflict to the entire region.
Iraq's government had tried to strike a balance between the two countries, both of which have close political and military ties to various elements of Iraq's elite.
- Balance now 'impossible' -
But the stunning developments of the last week -- from the killing of Soleimani to Wednesday's pre-dawn strikes -- also hugely exacerbated Iraq's political crisis.
"It has made a balance impossible and pushed Baghdad squarely into Iran's camp," said Toby Dodge, a professor at the London School of Economics.
Figures like Iraq's President Barham Salih, who was seen as one of the most senior officials with close ties to Washington, would likely see their influence dwindle.
"If last night was the theatre of retaliation, what today brings is political consolidation and domination of the pro-Iran factions," Toby said.
The Hashd's political arm, the Fatah bloc, has already seized on anti-US sentiment over the last week to push for a total ouster of foreign troops from Iraqi territory.
Some 5,200 American troops and hundreds more British, French, Canadian and other forces are based in Iraq to help local forces defeat jihadist sleeper cells.
On Wednesday, Iraqis' reactions to Iran's strikes were much tamer than the anger expressed at the US last week.
"Baghdad condemns the US publicly, but not Iran," said Ramzy Mardini, a researcher and Iraq expert.
While appearing to be pro-Washington in the current climate carries a political cost, some political figures may be busy behind the scenes trying to salvage Iraq's relationship with the US and restore some stability, however fragile.
But, Mardini warned, "if the crisis escalates, Baghdad's space for manoeuvering will shrink. They'll be forced to pick a side -- and it won't be the US."
Comments
Rudaw moderates all comments submitted on our website. We welcome comments which are relevant to the article and encourage further discussion about the issues that matter to you. We also welcome constructive criticism about Rudaw.
To be approved for publication, however, your comments must meet our community guidelines.
We will not tolerate the following: profanity, threats, personal attacks, vulgarity, abuse (such as sexism, racism, homophobia or xenophobia), or commercial or personal promotion.
Comments that do not meet our guidelines will be rejected. Comments are not edited – they are either approved or rejected.
Post a comment