US's General Electric beats out Germany's Siemens for Iraq contract - report

18-10-2018 4 Comments
Rudaw
Tags: electricity General Electric Siemens Baghdad-Washington relations United States Germany Baghdad-Berlin relations
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region — General Electric (GE) won a $15 billion deal against competitor Siemens that is meant to reenergize Iraq's suffering electricity grid, according to reports.

Boston-headquartered GE won the contract over Munich-based rival Siemens, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday citing unnamed sources. 

The deal involves supplying 11 gigawatts (11,000 megawatts) of power-generation to Iraq and was thought to be in the pocket of Siemens until the administration of US President Donald Trump pressured Baghdad. 


“The US government is holding a gun to our head,” FT reported quoting an unnamed adviser to Siemens.

The US government has not commented on the report. 

The move could be seen as an attempt by Washington to aid one of the country's legacy industry corporations. GE in the mid-20th century bordered on being a horizontal monopoly as it capitalized on the two world wars and financial boom that ensued.


Yahoo Finance reported GE will be looking to display strength as it nears its next earnings release on October 25, but cautioned that industry insiders rank the company on their long-term sell list because of dwindling annual returns. 


GE has sought to diversify in Iraq. It regularly makes sponsored posts on social media, claiming the contributions have improved the situation in the war-torn country whose electrical grid is insufficient. 


Iraq generates about 15,900 megawatts of electricity; it will require 35,000 by 2030, according to Middle East Utilities. Different provinces receive different amounts of energy. Baghdad reportedly received 20 hours or more of electricity per day this summer.

The news comes just ahead of Washington imposing energy sanctions against Iraq's top trading partner Iran in November.

Oil-rich Iraq was rocked by a series of protests this summer. Electricity supply was a main complaint.

Outgoing Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said in August that Baghdad was close to inking a contract with Siemens. 

Since then, Abadi has lost favor with the political and spiritual elite in Iraq. A second term is unlikely.

Comments

Rudaw moderates all comments submitted on our website. We welcome comments which are relevant to the article and encourage further discussion about the issues that matter to you. We also welcome constructive criticism about Rudaw.

To be approved for publication, however, your comments must meet our community guidelines.

We will not tolerate the following: profanity, threats, personal attacks, vulgarity, abuse (such as sexism, racism, homophobia or xenophobia), or commercial or personal promotion.

Comments that do not meet our guidelines will be rejected. Comments are not edited – they are either approved or rejected.

Post a comment

Required
Required
 
  • 20-10-2018
    FAUthman
    Surely GE would have checked with the State Dept about whether its employees would be safe in Iraq if GE were to accept this contract. GE engineers will be highly exposed and could become easy targets. Looks like GE was told to go ahead....hmmmm, interesting!!
  • 19-10-2018
    dilan
    "unnamed adviser" big claims with zero credibility = fake news
  • 18-10-2018
    Guest
    The individual who made a comment about the U.S. holding a gun to his head, doesn't understand what he is talking about. The U.S. government has nothing to do with General Electric's decision to bid on a contract or not. General Electric is not a government entity. If the shareholders of General Electric lose money because the company they have invested in makes a bad investment, they lose money, not the U.S. government. Having said that, it is good to see that Iraq is attracting some highly capable investors to develop the infrastructure and provide an income to local employees that will boost the private economy and reduce Iraq's reliance on oil revenues. Hopefully, Iraq is seeing the end of the continuous killing and destruction that has been going on for more than 45 years. It is not going to do any good to put in systems that are just going to get destroyed.
  • 18-10-2018
    pre-Boomer Marine brat
    Jack Welch essentially destroyed what GE had once been. Its post-WWII motto was "progress is out most important product". But Welch left the company's management stagnant and adverse to taking risks. Under Welch, the patent output of GE Labs tanked by 80%. Welch's successor, Jeff Immelt, desperately but unsuccessfully tried to pump the idea of risk-taking back into upper management ... I strongly suspect that Trump's "pressure" was the only reason GE could possibly have won that contract.