Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Kissinger Cables Shed Light on How US Sees the Kurds

By Hiwa Osman 22/4/2013


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has released a database of diplomatic records from the 1970s by then secretary of state Henry Kissinger, sheds light on how the Kurds are seen from an American perspective.

The released cables were not classified and had been available in national archives, but Assange’s main reason for compiling them is to show that, "The US administration cannot be trusted to maintain the history of its interactions with the world."

The database has been organized in a user-friendly way, so that ordinary people - not only historians and specialists - can easily go through the documents.

As a journalist, I went to the website, and typed the various usual keywords of Kurds, Kurdistan, Kurdish, KDP, Barzani, Talabani, etc., and found many cables that were telling of the consistency of US policy toward the Kurds.

The most striking discovery is that America always listened to others about the Kurdish "problem." Its Kurdish policy, if it existed, was through the eyes of the Iranian Shah, the Turkish Ambassador in Baghdad as well as other ambassadors. The US action toward the Kurds was always dictated by what others told Washington about the Kurds, not what the Kurds said themselves. This was true even on very basic issues.

One cable quotes Cuhruk, the Turkish Ambassador in Baghdad, talking about the points of difference between the Kurds and Baghdad as being:  “Over boundaries and census; control of central government over chief of executive regional council; and right to appoint local officials including police".

This is not very different from today's issues and the US attitude toward them. No wonder that Washington supported Baghdad over the Kurds.

The other stark point in the cables was their treatment and dealing with General Mustafa Barzani during and after the September revolution, despite the fact that not all cables related to the word Barzani are available in the search. The US was clearly not interested in him as a leader. All it wanted was to accommodate him and contain him as much as possible, in collaboration with Iran and Baghdad during the last days of his life in the USA.

In another cable from 1974, and the criticism of Al-Thawra newspaper of the Voice of America’s coverage of the Kurdish issue, it concludes by recommending that: "If accusations against US government reappear during coming week, Dept [of state] may wish to consider outlining US position at noon briefing in response to question. Hopefully it could include disclaimer of involvement in internal affairs and some recognition of GOI (Government of Iraq) efforts to resolve this historically difficult internal problem".

This cable should be read by all who are involved in talks or conflict with Baghdad. They should not rely much on outside support, especially the US.

The Iraq that the cable was referring to was an Iraq that the US had good relations with. Today's Iraq is also one that the US has good ties with. The above cable could perfectly be sent today if Baghdad accuses the US of siding with the Kurds.

Hiwa Osman is a media development specialist based in Erbil.


reo | 25/4/2013
But what about all the major US oil companies coming here? Exxon? They represent billion of dollars in income for the US. But yes, maybe they will make new contracts with the Iraqis. Even still, the kurds cant be stopped, especially not in these times.
Tags :

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Goondoo | 3/26/2015 8:34:50 AM
It is proven that these Shia militias are for themselves, not for Iraq as a country. Otherwise they would have welcome any assistance as the...
HAMID Sayadi | 3/26/2015 2:28:31 PM
The time is the essence!
US begins airstrikes in Tikrit after Baghdad request
| 20 hours ago | (4)
B Realio | 3/25/2015 5:12:22 PM
I do not get how USA can arm Ukraine and take Hezbollah off the terror-list and yet no removal of Kurd groups from that list. Also USA needs to give...
Ziad Nackshbandi | 3/26/2015 2:07:09 PM
That is so typical UK.. U gave Saddam chemical weapon to use against Kurdish people and U talking about democracy... Keep your dirty games away from...
British government backs Iraqi unity, praises the KRG and criticises the PYD
| 24/3/2015 | (34)
Leon Ash | 3/25/2015 2:56:58 PM
The Kurds will never get proper weapons as long as Obama is president. He is afraid of angering Turkey and Iran, and those two countries are afraid...
Dick Dickson | 3/26/2015 2:02:58 PM
Ted Cruz is popular in Texas because he does what he says he will do unlike a lot of our politicians who say anything to get elected and do what they...
US Senator: “We need to arm the Kurds”
| 9/2/2015 | (21)
Telh | 3/26/2015 1:38:25 PM
But isn't it all legitimate according to Islamic scriptures
KPatriot | 3/26/2015 1:59:48 PM
Mosul resident, you're a liar. Sour because of what we did to your master Saddam? We will take Mosul back and kick you Arabs back where you came from.
Shia-Sunni family from Mosul tells of terror under ISIS
| yesterday at 05:14 | (11)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Has ISIS Made Iran Stronger? 18/3/2015 | (9)

Has ISIS Made Iran Stronger?

Soleimani’s work is currently focused on Iraq more
Jolie opens UK academic center studying women in conflict 11/2/2015 | (3)

Jolie opens UK academic center studying women in conflict

Angelina Jolie has opened an academic center more
What Is Turkey's Future Under Erdogan? 27/1/2015 | (22)

What Is Turkey's Future Under Erdogan?

Where will his worldview take Turkey and the more
0.234 seconds